Davis Law Firm | Estate Planning Attorneys in Minnesota

Joint Tenancy vs. Tenants in Common
June 10, 2013

There are different ways to jointly own property, and the advantages and disadvantages of each can be confusing.  Joint tenancy and tenants in common are two ways to jointly own property in Minnesota with very distinct differences

Both joint tenancy and tenants in common describe a type of joint ownership over real property, and the deed should specify whether the real property is owned through joint tenancy or tenants in common.  In Minnesota, any deed that does not clearly state which type of joint ownership the property is owned through is automatically recognized as tenants in common.  While both allow for more than one individual to have an ownership interest in the property at hand, both are structured differently, and have different outcomes once one or more of the owners pass away.

Joint tenancy is most commonly used for joint ownership between two spouses or other family members.  The benefit of owning property through joint tenancy is the right of survivorship; when one owner dies their interest in the property is transferred to the surviving owner(s).  This transfer of interest, or ownership, is typically accomplished through the filing of an affidavit of survivorship.  Not only does owning property as joint tenants result in a much easier and cost-effective transfer when one owner passes away, but it also protects the property from probate.

Individuals who desire to own property with others who may not be family members often jointly own property as tenants in common, as a way to protect and control their interest in the property.  While the benefits of owning property as tenants in common include being able to sell, give away, mortgage, and devise each individual’s interest at any time, the disadvantages can be quite costly.  As opposed to joint tenancy, when one owner passes away while owning property as tenants in common the property does not transfer to the other owner(s).  Instead, the deceased owner’s portion of the property is subject to probate through their estate, and is then passes on to their heirs.

The information on this site is not intended to provide specific legal advice nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship may only be created through an explicit agreement with our firm.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To comply with requirements imposed by the Department of the Treasury, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written by the practitioner to be used, and that it cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (ii) supporting the promotion or marketing of any transactions or matters addressed herein.

Our use of a disclaimer does not change the high degree of care and attention that we devote to our tax advice. Moreover, the inclusion of the disclaimer does not indicate that penalties could be imposed on the transaction at issue, but rather merely indicates that the advice we have provided you in such communication does not preclude the IRS from asserting penalties. Finally, please be assured that the use of such a disclaimer to avoid unnecessary legal expenses is similar to the approach adopted by most other tax practitioners.

 

 

 

 

Contact Us


Davis Law Firm, P.A.
3006 Allegro Park Ln SW, STE 3
Rochester, MN 55902

Phone: 507-424-6330
Fax: 507-424-6332